Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nick Hardt vs Keegan Smith Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hardt vs Smith analysis and find out who is favored!
Nick Hardt vs Keegan Smith Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Hardt 1 - 0 Smith
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hardt has won 47.1% of points on their second serve, while Smith has won 49.25%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hardt, in recent form, has won 56.5% of their opponent's second serve points, while Smith has won 51.98%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.71% and 32.58% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hardt has saved 55.49% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Smith has saved 64.78% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hardt has won 59.09% of matches played (W/L 39/ 27), with Smith winning 58.21% (W/L 39/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hardt has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 140/ 84), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Smith has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 126/ 69), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 3/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Hardt has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.78% of matches (W/L 19/ 17), where as Smith has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.52% of matches (W/L 17/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hardt winning 1 times and Smith being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Hardt winning 2 and Smith winning 1. The last match between Hardt and Smith was at the M15 Santo Domingo, 11-12-2020, Quarterfinals, Hard with Nick Hardt getting the victory 6-1 4-6 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:19:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hardt and Smith have played a deciding set 1 times, with Hardt winning 1 times and Smith 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hardt winning 0, and Smith 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hardt has played against opponents with an average rank of 317.35 while Smith has played against players with an average rank of 173.51.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hardt has won 54% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Smith has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hardt has converted 45.62% of breakpoint opportunities, and Smith has converted 38.97% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
193
Rank
193
High
23
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
595
Rank
339
High
25
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
61% (216-140)
Career Total W/L
61% (147-93)
69% (31-14)
YTD W/L
58% (15-11)
$54,350
Career Prize Money
$4,570
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Nick Hardt | Keegan Smith |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 10 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:19:0 | 2:19:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (53/80) | 64% (56/87) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (39/53) | 57% (32/56) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 63% (17/27) | 48% (15/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 50% (1/2) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (40/87) | 30% (24/80) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 4-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Nick Hardt
Player
Keegan Smith
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
87)
0
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
24 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
96
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nick Hardt | Keegan Smith |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 69% (31/14) | 58% (15/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 64% (68/38) | 59% (36/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (541/435) | 55% (321/266) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 55% (6/5) | 63% (15/9) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 74% (25/9) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.15 | 0.54 |
| Aces Total | 70 | 156 |
| DFs per game | 0.37 | 0.26 |
| DFs Total | 175 | 76 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:48 | 1:34:7 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 338.93 | 190.92 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (2057/3125) | 70% (1220/1749) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (1326/2057) | 70% (856/1220) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (503/1068) | 48% (255/529) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (198/434) | 39% (70/178) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (1529/3293) | 40% (694/1742) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 65% (13/7) | 50% (7/7) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (15/5) | 67% (8/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 69% (31/45) | 58% (15/26) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (6/8) | 40% (2/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 63% (10/16) | 33% (3/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (29/26) | 88% (16/14) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (29/3) | 13% (16/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 31% (16/5) | 10% (10/1) |
Nick Hardt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Nick Hardt
47%
(
48 of
102)
1st Serve %
70%
(
71 of
101)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
8
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
48%
(
26 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
47%
(
48 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
53 of
101)
107
Total Points Won
96
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Valentin Vacherot
Player
Nick Hardt
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
49%
(
25 of
51)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nick Hardt
Player
Alexander Weis
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve %
51%
(
27 of
53)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jacopo Berrettini
Player
Nick Hardt
65%
(
73 of
113)
1st Serve %
58%
(
50 of
86)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
70%
(
51 of
73)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
38%
(
15 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
42%
(
47 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
105
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nick Hardt
Player
Andrea Pellegrino
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
78%
(
57 of
73)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nick Hardt
Player
Maks Kasnikowski
73%
(
83 of
113)
1st Serve %
51%
(
54 of
106)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
7
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
40 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
106)
116
Total Points Won
103
|
6-7(7) 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nick Hardt
Player
Enrico Dalla Valle
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
29 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Nick Hardt
79%
(
54 of
68)
1st Serve %
82%
(
49 of
60)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nick Hardt
Player
Martin Landaluce
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
51%
(
45 of
88)
4
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nick Hardt
Player
Hugo Dellien
70%
(
78 of
111)
1st Serve %
73%
(
90 of
123)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
57 of
90)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
44 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
55 of
123)
122
Total Points Won
112
|
4-6 7-6(0) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Keegan Smith Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Mukund Sasikumar
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
86)
13
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
86
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Keegan Smith
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Axel Nefve
58%
(
80 of
138)
1st Serve %
69%
(
80 of
116)
5
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
8
73%
(
58 of
80)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
60 of
80)
43%
(
25 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
40%
(
55 of
138)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
46 of
116)
129
Total Points Won
125
|
7-5 6-7(8) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Andres Urrea
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
43%
(
22 of
51)
5
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
66
Total Points Won
40
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Lock
Player
Keegan Smith
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
78%
(
64 of
82)
10
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
4
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
12 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
79
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Bellier
Player
Keegan Smith
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
75%
(
33 of
44)
10
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
14 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
88%
(
37 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Santiago Padilla Cote
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
35
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Keegan Smith
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
1
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
3
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mario Gonzalez Fernandez
Player
Keegan Smith
79%
(
85 of
107)
1st Serve %
67%
(
66 of
98)
2
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
5
62%
(
53 of
85)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
40%
(
43 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
106
Total Points Won
99
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Hardt Vs Smith Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Nick Hardt
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
